Evaluation of masticatory efficiency and OHRQoL in implant-retained overdenture with different numbers of implant in the edentulous mandible: a one-year follow-up prospective study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to evaluate to the masticatory function performance and Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) in implant-retained overdenture compared with different implant number placements in the edentulous mandible. METHODS: From 2013 to 2015, each patients received 3 implants (iSy-Implant, Camlog, Wimsheim, Germany) in intraforaminal mandible (34, 41/31, 44). After operation, inserted implants were gradually loaded and incorporated into an overdenture with a self-aligning attachment system (Locator abutments) in 3 + 3 + 3 months. Five checked points were performed chewing cycle test with multicolored chewing gum and OHIP-G14 questionnaire and a sum score questionnaire as following: pre-operation, one implant load (41/31), two implants loaded (33,43), three implants loaded and 1-year follow up. RESULT: A total of 10 patients with 30 implants were placed, the survival rate of the implants was 100% within 1-year follow-up. Regarding the masticatory function analysis, for the higher number of chewing cycles, the higher mixing rate was observed. After 1 year, the inter-mixing rate without significant changes was found compared to the time after three implants were loaded with attachment system. The mean value of OHIP-G14 was 30.4 preoperatively, 21.1 after loading the first locator, 10.7 after loading two locator abutments, and 3.2 after loading all three locator abutments. After 1 year, OHIP-G14 was 2.6 without significantly changed. The mean of the sum score was 15.5 preoperatively, 27.8 after activation of the first locator, 39.4 after activation of two locators, 46.2 after activation of all three locators, and 47.3 after 1 year. An increase of 0.7 sum score units per time point was observed. No significance was detectable, analogous to OHIP-G14, compared to the time of activation of all three locator setups (p-value = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement in masticatory function performance and OHRQoL was evaluated with the increasing number of implants with locator attachment in edentulous mandible. With the investigation of the OHIP-G14 and sum score, the results of patient report outcome might be associated with the increase in the number of implants.

Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants vs All-on-Four Concept: A Randomized Clinical Study.

AIM: To compare between the rehabilitation of atrophied maxilla with fixed prosthesis using two posterior zygomatic implants and two conventional anterior implants or four implants inserted according to the all-on-four concept regarding the patient quality of life and satisfaction after one year of prosthesis insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with atrophic edentulous maxillae were randomized into two groups: Group I (rehabilitated with fixed prostheses supported by two zygomatic and two conventional implants in the anterior region) and group II (fixed prostheses on four implants in the anterior region following an all-on-four concept). One year after the placement of the definitive prostheses, patients completed oral health impact profile-14 and satisfaction questionnaires. RESULTS: All patients were satisfied regarding retention, stability, occlusion, comfort, cleaning, speaking, chewing, bolus quality, appearance, handling, prosthesis apart, and embarrassing, with no significant significance between two groups except satisfaction with surgical procedures and healing period. CONCLUSIONS: Using two distally tilted zygomatic implants or all-on-four concept to rehabilitate atrophied maxilla by fixed detachable prosthesis could be considered a promising functional and esthetic treatment option regarding the patient satisfaction. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Traditionally, treatment of maxillary atrophied ridges was done by bone grafting or sinus-lifting techniques; however, using all-on-four concept or zygomatic implants was a successful treatment as it has high success rates and highly satisfied by the patients. How to cite this article: Nagib MA, Ibrahim AM, Abdel-Rahman FH, et al. Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants vs All-on-Four Concept: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):141-147.

Pretreatment periodontitis is predictive of a poorer prognosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Poor oral health is an independent risk factor for upper-aerodigestive tract cancers, including esophageal cancer. Several studies have investigated short-term outcomes after esophagectomy and the impact of periodontal disease, but few have examined the impact of periodontal disease on long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rate of periodontitis among esophagectomy patients and the prognostic value of periodontitis and its effect on prognosis after esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 508 patients who underwent esophagectomy received oral health care from a dentist before cancer treatment at Akita University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2021. We assessed the presence and severity of the patients' periodontitis and divided them into no-periodontitis, mild periodontitis, severe periodontitis and edentulous jaw groups. We then assessed 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) and determined whether periodontitis was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS and DSS. RESULTS: We found that 101 (19.9%) patients had no periodontitis, 207 (40.8%) had mild periodontitis, 176 (34.6%) had severe periodontitis requiring tooth extraction, and 24 (4.7%) had edentulous jaw. Both OS and DSS were significantly poorer in the periodontitis than no-periodontitis group (p < 0.001). In detail, the edentulous jaw group had the poorest prognosis (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that periodontitis was an independent risk factor affecting OS and DSS. CONCLUSION: Esophageal cancer patients had a high prevalence of periodontitis. Moreover, the presence of periodontitis and severity of periodontitis are independent risk factors contributing to a poorer prognosis after esophagectomy.

Novel complete-arch pillar system (CAPS) to register implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit.

OBJECTIVES: This article presents a novel complete-arch pillar system (CAPS) to register implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit for implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The novel system presents a 3-unit toolset comprising intraoral scan bodies (ISBs), lateral pillar attachments (LPAs) and occlusal pillar attachments (OPAs). A 2-stage single visit workflow by an intraoral scanner (Trios 5) was introduced. The first stage "Screw-Scan-Done" was used to describe complete-arch intraoral implant scanning using LPAs. The second stage "Screw-Occlude-Done" involved virtual occlusal recording using OPAs. Two patients with one single edentulous arch were selected for this study. In the first patient, 6 bone level implants (Bone Level Tapered, Straumann) were placed in the edentulous maxilla at positions 12, 14, 16, 22, 24 and 26. In the second patient, 4 bone level implants (NobelActive CC, Nobel Biocare) were placed in the edentulous mandible at positions 32, 35, 42 and 45. A CAD-CAM procedure was initiated with the acquired IOS data to fabricate an interim IFCDP at the same day. Periapical radiographs were obtained of the implant-prosthetic connection of the definitive IFCDPs to verify the passive fit. Metrology software (Geomagic Qualify, 3D Systems - Matlab, Mathworks) was used to assess the implant analogs position in the 3D-printed casts used for fabricating the definitive IFCDPs. A quantitative occlusal relationship analysis was performed with IOS. RESULTS: Radiographic examination revealed no gaps at implant-prosthetic connection of the definitive IFCDPs. The 3D-printed casts showed an overall average distance deviation within the clinically acceptable range of errors of 150 µm. Quantitative occlusal relationship analysis with IOS showed well-distributed contacts. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) A 3-unit toolset with ISBs, LPAs and OPAs allows to register the implant position and maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit; (2) the 2-stage clinical workflow with the CAPS system facilitates the IOS data acquisition for fabrication of an interim IFCDP at the same day; (3) a passive fit was demonstrated for the interim and the definitive IFCDPs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The CAPS system can help clinicians to register the implant position and the maxillomandibular relationship in one single visit for the fabrication of an IFCDP.

Prevalence and Association between Primary Stability and Bone Quality in Implants Placed in Edentulous Dental Arches: A Retrospective Analysis.

Immediate function has become an accepted treatment modality for fixed restorations in completely edentulous jaws. The dental implants have gained immense popularity. A secure implant primary stability is positively associated with a successful implant integration and long term successful clinical outcome. The main aim of this study was to find the association between primary stability and bone density in implants placed in maxilla and mandible. A total of 1263 patients who had undergone implant placement from March 2020-March 2021 in Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, India were chosen for the study. The primary stability and bone density of these patients were collected from the hospital records. The collected data was compiled, reviewed, tabulated in Microsoft Excel sheet and entered in SPSS software for statistical analysis. In the present study, the patient aged between 28 and 37 years had undergone more implant placement (31%) with male predilection (53%). The most commonly associated primary stability was found to be 30-40 Ncm (51.37%) predominantly with D2 type of bone density (52.69%). A Chi-squared statistical test was done for primary stability and bone density and the P was found to be 0.00 (Chi-squared P < 0.05, statistically significant). The most predominant bone density was D2 associated with primary stability of 30-40 Ncm. The association between bone density and primary stability was found to be statistically significant. The present study shows a strong relationship between bone density and primary implant stability.

Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and implant therapy: A prospective multicenter study of preoperative, intermediate, and posttreatment assessment.

The purpose of this multicenter continuation study was to use high patient numbers in order to generate reliable statements regarding the association between different implant indications and OHRQoL. Patients with various types of indication for dental implants, ranging from single tooth loss to edentulous jaws, were included. Quality of life relating to dental implants was assessed through the oral health impact profile (OHIP-G-21), which has a summary score from 0 to 20 in healthy patients. In total, 16 253 patients from 29 centers (European Centers for Dental Implantology (ECDI)) were involved in the study between 2009 and 2021.8251 patients (50.7%) completed the questionnaire after implant insertion, and 4996 patients (30.7%) after prosthodontic treatment. The average age was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Posterior single-tooth gap (28.5%) and free-end gap (27.8%) were the most frequent indications. The preoperative OHIP-G-21 score for all patients was 32.81 (SD 11.92), while the score during the healing period was 30.00 (SD 10.72), and after completion of treatment 27.24 (SD 9.26) (p < 0.001). The most significant improvements in OHIP-G-21 scores were in the indication of edentulous jaw (phase 1, 41.81 (SD 15.53); phase 2, 35.39 (SD 14.22); phase 3, 29.60 (SD 10.12) (p < 0.001). The study revealed significant improvements in the most frequently reported problems (chewing, serious concerns, appearance) (p < 0.001). Insertion of dental implants and prosthodontic rehabilitation led to an improved OHRQoL for patients with all indications for dental implants. Special attention should be paid to patients with edentulous jaw, since in comparison with other indications it had the greatest impact on improving OHRQoL. The psychological dissatisfaction scale of the OHIP-G-21 represented the most important factors for patients, and these scores were substantially influenced by implant therapy. Thus, treating physicians should increase their focus on these factors, in order to avoid dissatisfaction and increase the likelihood of complete implant therapy success.

Peri-zygomatic complications on zygomatic implants with or without penetrating the external surface of zygoma: A 2-year retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the difference in the incidence of peri-zygomatic complications (PZCs) when zygomatic implants (ZIs) penetrate or do not penetrate the external surface of zygoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 32 patients with edentulous maxillae or potentially edentulous maxillae undergo zygomatic implantation. The patients were divided into the penetration group (P-group) and the non-penetration group (N-group) according to whether the apex of implants penetrated the external surface of zygoma in postoperative CBCT. The extension length, the penetration section of the implants, and the skin thickness at the corresponding position were simultaneously measured. Clinical follow-up was conducted regularly until 2 years after surgery. The occurrence of PZCs (including peri-zygomatic infection, skin numbness, non-infectious pain, and foreign body sensation) was recorded. A mixed effect logistic model was used to compare the difference of complication rate between the P-group and the N-group, and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Then identify the impact of the extension length, penetration section and skin thickness in P-group with the same model. RESULTS: A total of 71 ZIs were implanted in 32 patients, including 37 implants in the P-group and 34 implants in the N-group. During the 2-year follow-up, a total of 13 implants occurred PZCs, with an overall complication rate of 18.3%. Thereinto, the incidence rate was 29.7% in the P-group, and 5.9% in the N-group (OR = 6.77). In P-group, there was a significant difference in complication rate of different extension lengths, while the penetration section and skin thickness had no statistical significance on the complication rate. CONCLUSION: Under the limitation of this study, to minimize the risk of PZCs, ZI should be placed in a manner that avoids the apex penetrating the external surface of the zygoma.

Modified Technique to Rehabilitate American Society of Anesthesiology-III Patient, Through Flapless Procedure With Computed Tomography-Guided Surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a computed tomography-guided surgery implant placement with a flapless technique and immediate functional loading in an American Society of Anesthesiology-III patient. METHODS: This technical note involved a 64-year-old American Society of Anesthesiology-III patient. Her hopeless teeth were extracted and a restorative evaluation was provided as a prosthetic reference. The surgical procedure was based on the flapless technique that let us to use local anesthesia. The authors used an All-on-4 concept restoration for maxilla and conventional fixed prosthesis procedures for jaw rehabilitation. The authors placed 4 tilted implants in the upper maxilla and 6 right implants in the jaw. Implants were loaded with a provisional prosthesis on the same day of surgery. Five months later, provisional restoration was removed; the authors placed into the ceramic crowns 2 Procera Implant Bridge (Nobel Biocare) frameworks, developed through computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-guided surgery is a minimally invasive technique that allows, through a flapless approach, safer and more predictable procedures. In this technical note, the authors achieved accurate implant placement and precise fit of restoration with natural looking appearance; this patient-oriented-treatment led to a reduced healing time with better compliance.

Technique-Related Survival Rate and Complications of Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the survival rate (SR) and probability of postoperative complications at both the implant and patient level for each of the four surgical techniques for zygomatic implant (ZI) placement: Brånemark, sinus slot, extrasinus, and extramaxillary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical studies that reported the survival rate and postoperative ZI complications for the rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous maxillae was conducted based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations. Two independent reviewers consulted four databases during the literature search: MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Clinicaltrials.gov, and LILACS. Duplicate articles were eliminated. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that study design (prospective vs retrospective) had no significant impact (P = .10) on the outcomes. The SR was highest for the Brånemark and extrasinus techniques (100%) and lowest for the sinus slot technique (94%; 95% CI = 86% to 102%). The extramaxillary (38%; 95% CI = 1% to 3%) and the Brånemark (29%; 95% CI = 15% to 44%) techniques resulted in the highest occurrence of patient-level complications. Moreover, the extramaxillary technique showed the highest percentage of prothesis-related complications (44%; 95% CI = 27% to 62%). CONCLUSIONS: ZI placement was demonstrated to be a reliable technique for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxillae, irrespective of the surgical technique evaluated. Accurate case and surgical protocol selection is of paramount importance to reduce technique-related postoperative complications.

Comparative Evaluation of Survival Rates and Marginal Bone Levels of Nonsplinted Immediately Loaded Interforaminal Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with 5-Year Results.

PURPOSE: Τo evaluate and compare the marginal bone loss (MBL), survival rates, and periodontal parameters of immediately loaded implants with either Dolder bar or Locator attachments placed in the interforaminal region of edentulous mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of included 19 patients with edentulous mandibles each received two implants in the interforaminal area of the symphysis. Randomly allocated Dolder bar or Locator attachments were then attached immediately, and both clips and a framework were fastened to the denture by the dental laboratory within 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 28 subjects with 56 implants were treated in accordance with the immediate-loading study protocol. Of these, 9 patients were lost to follow-up; 1 patient reported a serious illness and 8 patients moved and couldn't be reached. The 19 subjects not lost to follow-up (11 women and 8 men; average age: 68 years) were included. Every patient received either two Locator abutments and were assigned to group A (7 patients; 36.8%) or two multiunit abutments and were assigned to group B (12 patients; 63.2%). No implant failure was detected for either group, and therefore the survival rate for both groups was 100% after 5 years. After 5 years without any symptoms, 2 implants from group A and 7 implants from group B showed > 2 mm of MBL, which makes the group A success rate 85.7% and the group B success rate 70.8%. Modified sulcular bleeding index (mSBI) did not differ significantly at any of the measurement intervals. However, the modified plaque index (mPI) of group B was significantly higher than group A at the 60-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that either splinting or not splinting the immediately loaded interforaminal implants to retain mandibular overdentures (OVDs) does not affect marginal bone levels after 5 years and immediate loading of nonsplinted implants with Locator attachments can be safely preferred to retain mandibular OVDs.

Instantaneous dental implant loading technique by fixed dentures: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In the context of dental prostheses, splinting multiple implants together may improve their stability. The approach may be especially favorable when performing immediate loading procedures, increasing the implant osseointegration rate, and reducing the risk of implant and prosthetic failure. The instantaneous loading technique (ILT) involves creating a metal framework to splint the implants by intraorally welding them pair-by-pair, using purposefully created abutments. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the prosthetic success when using ILT to rehabilitate partially edentulous patients through immediately loaded prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical records of patients treated with ILT were retrospectively assessed, and the prosthetic success rate was analyzed in terms of fractures, chipping, unscrewing, screw fracture rate, and mucositis. Furthermore, the implant success rates were evaluated by measuring marginal bone loss (MBL). RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (20 males and 35 females with a mean age of 59.8 ±9.4 years), corresponding to 66 prostheses, were included. A total of 160 implants were placed. At the last follow-up (39.6 ±28.4 months), 1 patient (1.8%; 1 prosthesis (1.5%)) showed the fracture of the prosthesis material. Peri-implantitis affected 4 implants (2.5%), and 4 more implants (2.5%) showed radiolucency, affecting 5 patients (9.1%). Two other patients (3.6%) suffered from mucositis. The implant success rate, according to the Albrektsson and Zarb criteria, was 94.4%. No implants were lost. The mean MBL values at the implant level, the prosthesis level and the patient level were 0.28 ±0.56 mm, 0.30 ±0.51 mm and 0.33 ±0.54 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The instantaneous loading technique appears to be a viable approach to rehabilitating partially edentulous patients through immediate loading.

Digital design and manufacture of a stackable implant surgical guide for immediate loading in completely edentulous full-arch cases: a dental technique.

The design and manufacture of a stackable surgical guide for implant placement with immediate prosthetic loading of completely edentulous cases is described in this dental technique. To achieve this, the stackable attachment is designed using free-form designing software, which is later joined to the implant placement guide and the dental prosthesis. This technique should provide the patient with a same-day implant and an esthetic restoration accurately placed in the predesigned position of the centric occluding relationship. It also reduces the number of visits and prosthetic complications related to the improper implant position.

Effect of the level of alveolar atrophy on implant placement accuracy in guided surgery for full-arch restorations supported by four implants: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: A fixed screw-retained full-arch restoration supported by four implants is a popular treatment option for edentulous arches. Optimal alignment of implants is quite challenging in extremely atrophied edentulous cases, and a small amount of deviation is expected during guided surgery. This study aimed to compare implant accuracy among edentulous jaws with various levels of atrophy. METHODS: Five separate copies of each Cawood and Howell model (III-V) were produced for the maxilla and mandible. A total of 120 implants (30 models). The implant accuracy was assessed based on angular deviations at the base (angle, 3D offset, distal, vestibular, and apical) and tip (3D offset, distal, vestibular, and apical). RESULTS: The atrophy level of the jaws had a statistically significant effect on deviation; implants showed greater deviation from the planned location as the atrophy level increased. CONCLUSION: Given that implant deviation increased with the degree of atrophy, a greater safety margin from important anatomical structures is recommended when planning implant location for guided surgery in Cawood and Howell V cases.

The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of implant placement using a dynamic navigation system in fully edentulous jaws and to analyze the influence of implant distribution on implant position accuracy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous patients who received implant placement using a dynamic navigation system were included. Four to six mini screws were placed in the edentulous jaw under local anesthesia as fiducial markers. Then patients received CBCT scans. Virtual implant positions were designed in the planning software based on CBCT data. Under local anesthesia, implants were inserted under the guidance of the dynamic navigation system. CBCTs were taken following implant placement. The deviation between the actual and planned implant positions was measured by comparing the pre- and postsurgery CBCT. RESULTS: A total of 13 edentulous patients with 13 edentulous maxillae and 7 edentulous mandibles were included, and 108 implants were placed. The average linear deviations at the implant entry point and apex were 1.08 ± 0.52 mm and 1.15 ± 0.60 mm, respectively. The average angular deviation was 2.85 ± 1.20°. No significant difference was detected in linear and angular deviations between the maxillary and mandibular implants, neither between the anterior and posterior implants. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic navigation system provides high accuracy for implant placement in fully edentulous jaws, while the distribution of the implants showed little impact on implant position accuracy.

Patients experience and satisfaction with immediate loading of implant-supported overdentures - A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives and experiences of edentate individuals in regard to the immediate-loading protocol of an implant-supported overdenture. METHODS: A qualitative approach and interpretive description methodology was used. Seventeen edentate individuals (mean age: 61.9 ± 6.6 years) who received implant-supported overdentures through an immediate-loading protocol participated. Audio-recorded, semi-structured, in-depth interviews, each with a 60-90-minute duration, were conducted by two trained interviewers. The interview guide was developed based on Perneger's Detailed Model. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic approach including interview debriefing, transcript coding, data display, inductive thematic analysis, and interpretation. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the interviews: patient awareness and engagement with treatment, experience-shaped expectations, and immediate gratification. All patients expressed satisfaction with the treatment. Providing detailed information, good communication, and accessibility of the dental care provider had a significant impact on patient satisfaction with prosthetic care. Patients highlighted that the high cost of implant therapy was the major barrier to receiving this treatment in the private sector and perceived dental insurance coverage as a facilitator of this process. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings conclude that patient awareness about immediate-loading protocol improved their treatment engagement, and patient satisfaction with the treatment outcomes was higher than anticipated. The satisfaction was primarily related to prosthesis stability, receiving the prosthesis the same day, and low cost of treatment. Patients' positive experience and satisfaction with the immediate-loading protocol indicate that this treatment modality should be considered in treatment planning for edentate individuals. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The perceptions and experiences of edentulous patients gathered in this study highlight their satisfaction with immediate loading for implant-supported overdentures. This therapeutic modality can be considered a viable option in treatment planning for edentulous individuals.

Two or four implants for maxillary overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillary implant overdenture therapy is a good treatment option for treating patients experiencing problems with their conventional maxillary denture. Retaining the overdenture with four implants and a bar attachment system serves as the current gold standard. However, there is a demand for less costly and less invasive treatment options. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare marginal bone level change (MBLC), implant and overdenture survival, clinical, masticatory, and patient-related outcomes (PROMs) of maxillary implant overdentures with either two or four implants and a bar attachment system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty edentulous participants were randomly allocated to two groups (n = 20), to receive either two or four implants in the maxilla. After healing, all the participants received an implant overdenture retained by a bar attachment system. All the participants were evaluated 1 and 12 months after overdenture placement. The primary outcome was MBLC. Secondary outcomes were implant and overdenture survival, clinical, masticatory, and PROMs. The outcomes were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests. RESULTS: MBLC was -0.03 mm in the 2-implant group and -0.16 mm in the 4-implant group (p = 0.21). Implant survival was 83.3% in the 2-implant group and 94.4% in the 4-implant group (p = 0.03). The median pocket depth change and clinical outcomes were low, and masticatory performance along with PROMs improved in both groups and did not differ significantly between them. CONCLUSION: Maxillary 4-implant overdentures perform better than maxillary 2-implant overdentures with a bar attachment system in terms of implant and overdenture survival and therefore remains the gold standard. However, both overdentures perform similarly in terms of MBLC, clinical, masticatory, and PROMs.

Comparison between Two Design Concepts of Four Implants Placement Used to Support Telescopic Mandibular Overdenture: A Prospective Study of Implant Marginal Bone Height Changes.

AIM: The aim of this present study was to compare two placement designs of four implants used to support a telescopic mandibular overdenture regarding the marginal bone height changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient received four implants. Two anterior implants were installed vertically in the canine area. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the direction of posterior implants installed in the premolar area. Group I: where the implants were installed vertically parallel to the anterior implants and group II: where the implants were installed 30º distally. The implants were delayed loaded with a telescopic mandibular overdenture. The implant's marginal bone changes were evaluated after 6 and 12 months of overdenture insertion. RESULTS: Mean marginal bone loss of anterior implants showed a statistically significant difference between both groups. The vertically parallel posterior implants in group I showed statistically significant higher marginal bone loss than posterior implants in group II after follow-up periods. The 30º distally tilted posterior implants maintained the implant marginal bone after 12 months of overdenture insertion. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with telescopic overdenture supported by four parallel implants is a promising successful treatment option. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Tilting the posterior implants will improve the anteroposterior spread that in turn increases the support and the survival rate of the implants. Also, using this technique gives us an opportunity to use fewer implants.

Accuracy and patient-centered results of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare implant positioning accuracy and patient-centered results between static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS and d-CAIS) in edentulous jaws. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The current study retrospectively evaluated a total of 110 implants placed in 22 fully edentulous patients via s-CAIS or d-CAIS (n = 11). The accuracy of implant positioning was assessed by measuring the implant's angular deviation and deviation at the platform and apex from the preoperative design postoperatively. Patient-centered results, including preoperative and intraoperative patient-reported experiences and postoperative patient-reported outcomes, were extracted from the medical records. The nested t test and chi-square test were used to compare accuracy and patient-centered results between s-CAIS and d-CAIS postoperatively. RESULTS: The implants in the s-CAIS group showed significantly smaller angular deviation (2.32 ± 1.23°) than those in the d-CAIS group (3.87 ± 2.75°). In contrast, the platform and apical deviation were significantly larger in s-CAIS (1.56 ± 1.19 mm and 1.70 ± 1.09 mm, respectively) than d-CAIS (1.02 ± 0.45 mm and 1.00 ± 0.51 mm, respectively). Furthermore, the implants in the s-CAIS group deviated significantly (p < 0.001) more toward the coronal direction than those in the d-CAIS group. Notably, all patients in the s-CAIS group reported an obvious foreign body sensation during surgery, representing a significant difference from the d-CAIS group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to s-CAIS, d-CAIS is a reliable technique for the placement of multiple implants in fully edentulous patients with less linear deviation and less foreign body sensation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The retrospective study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on August 8th, 2022, with registration number No. ChiCTR2200062484. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite the increasing use of computer- assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients, clinical evidence comparing implant positioning accuracy and patient-centered results between static and dynamic CAIS systems is scarce. Our study demonstrated that compared to s-CAIS, d-CAIS is a reliable technique for the placement of multiple implants in fully edentulous patients with less linear deviation.

5- to 15-Year Survival of Immediately Loaded Implants in Fully Edentulous Maxillae: A Multilevel Analysis in a Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Although immediate-loading implant (ILI) treatment is a general treatment strategy for fully edentulous maxillae, long-term evidence is required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical results of, and risk factors for, ILI treatment in fully edentulous maxillae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ILI treatments of maxillae using 526 implants in 117 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The longest and mean observation periods were 15 years and 9.2 years, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis, log-rank tests, and multilevel mixed-effects parametric survival analysis were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 38 of 526 implants failed in 23 patients, and the estimated 15-year cumulative implant-level and patient-level survival rates were 90.7% and 73.7%, respectively. The cumulative implant survival rate was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients. Sex, implant length, and implant diameter were significantly associated with implant survival. CONCLUSION: ILI treatment of completely edentulous maxillae demonstrated viable long-term clinical outcomes. Male sex, shorter implant length, and narrow implant diameter negatively affected implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:516-522. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10310.

The New Generation of Subperiosteal Implants for Patient-Specific Treatment of Atrophic Dental Arches: Literature Review and Two Case Reports.

Subperiosteal implants were first introduced in the early 1940s for the treatment of edentulous maxillary and mandibular arches with severe bone atrophy. After achieving widespread popularity in the 80s and 90s, this denture therapy was progressively abandoned due to significant technique limitations, including high rates of infection and the complications and difficulties with positioning implants and obtaining sufficiently extensive bone impressions. In the last two decades, digital technology has dramatically changed the world of implant dentistry. In particular, modern diagnostic imaging, digital technology, and direct metal laser sintering now allow for the projection of implants with the proper extension, leading to the fabrication of custom-made titanium meshes that perfectly fit the specific anatomical requirements of patients. With modern production methods, subperiosteal implants have been digitally reinterpreted, and interest in them is being renewed for the treatment of edentulous patients with atrophic arches. This article describes the evolution of subperiosteal implants in recent years and presents two clinical cases involving the placement of new generation (NG) subperiosteal implants with the clinical and radiographic findings at the 1-year follow-up.